That being said, I ran across an interesting concept today that had never occurred to me before. And to be honest, it initially rubbed me the wrong way. I was reading a thread on a message board about opinions on high-tech gender selection. Basically, choosing the sex of your baby by using science and technology, ie. MicroSort. I'll tread lightly on my own thoughts about MicroSort and the like. In general I'm an "in moderation" type of person and I'm incredibly grateful for advances in science that even make such a thing a possibility. It wasn't the fact that this sort of technology is available that rubbed me the wrong way. It was the suggestion by some of the posters on the thread that did. The thought held by some of them that MicroSort might be necessary in order to correct a gender "imbalance" in the family.
I'm sure I'm internalizing these comments too much, but indulge me for a moment. At first glance I suppose that our family would be considered "imbalanced". In a mere 6 weeks it will be 5 to 1 in favor of estrogen. Our pink/red laundry still outweighs all other colors handsdown. Even though we have a bin full of matchbox cars and a race and go speedway, they get passed over more often than not in favor of Littlest Pet Shop, My Little Pony and Barbie. And yet, I look at my family and I see not imbalance, but perfection - exactly what was intended to be.
I realize that it is probably difficult for me to have an unbiased opinion about this "imbalanced family" concept given the status of my own family. It just bothers me to think that someone might look at us walking through the mall or eating at a restaurant and actually pity hubby and I for having an "imbalance", as if it's a disease or something. And perhaps it's just semantics. Maybe if a different choice of words was used, it might not sting quite as much. Imbalance suggests imperfection, no? But by the same token, I hate to think that there are people in this world that may feel their own families are "imbalanced" because they only have girls, or only have boys, or maybe have some of each but not equal parts. I can totally understand wishing to experience pink or blue and totally sympathize with those that feel somehow incomplete if they for whatever reason are not able to. But to suggest that a family is somehow imbalanced or imperfect simply because of the gender makeup of the children bothers me. And I suppose this is the point where my own views and beliefs come into play. I don't know why hubby and I are the parents of (almost) 4 girls and no boys, but I believe beyond a shadow of a doubt that this is how it was meant to be. That for whatever reason we were chosen to be the leaders of this Planet Pink. And in my (maybe not so humble) opinion we're doing the best we can at it.
Would it have been interesting and exciting to add a little blue to this planet? Sure thing. But I would suggest that balance is NOT what blue would have brought to our family dynamic at this point!
Yes, with 5 boys and a girl at the end I still get a bit annoyed when people say, "Oh you just kept going till you got a girl!" I try to really politely respond that I simply wanted another baby. I don't find my household imbalanced at all. We are what we are.
ReplyDeleteI'm excited for your new little Princess! Be sure to let me know when she arrives. xoxo, m
p.s. between the two of us we are balancing the world pretty well. ;)